Innovation doesn't just happen, an innovation is the result of daring
to live and work within a new paradigm. Contrary to the television programme
"Made in New Zealand", our firms are not good innovators. The
qualities of innovators are not appreciated. Innovators prove hard to work
with, they ask too many questions, they are too independent. Innovators
disturb the status quo, they are capable of changing things. Many of our
best innovators are among the unemployed, trapped outside the work force.
The experience of unemployment is developing a group of angry people who
have been disadvantaged by circumstances beyond their control. This anger
generates energy which needs to be directed into becoming knowledgeable,
innovative and productive. The alternatively that energy will be directed
to violence and anti-social activity.
Innovation is a personal activity. Groups don't have ideas, people do.
Other people can help, contact with like minded peers is essential and
the support of a mentor can be vital. There is a silly notion that everyone
can be instantly creative, so "let's do it" now. A brainstorming
session is held, over a hundred ideas are produced, lots of original or
creative suggestions are made, but no progress is likely. Innovative ideas
need to be integrated with real events and adapted to the availability
of resources and skills. Innovation is not the result of 100,000 monkeys
randomly typing. Innovation happens when one prepared person gets an insight
that produces a workable proposal. Innovation is not the result of 50 or
100 unprepared people blindly making suggestions. That is merely an entertainment
that pretends to be a productive activity. In contrast, the suggestions
of 5 well prepared people might be very valuable. The problem is always
to find one well prepared person let alone five. In regards to unemployment,
the real issue is how do we improve the skills and innovative capacity
of every member of the community? How do we make every person a learning
person outside of schools and learning institutions? How do we make every
firm a learning organisation? How do we up-grade the skills of a whole
You can attend as many courses as you wish. You can be taught by the
best teachers, you can learn the material so that you can pass the exam,
but only a tiny fraction of that work will become part of you. This is
why the training of the work force cannot be done in the schools and universities.
You can get a head start in class, but the best training is integrated
with your life and is discovered in daily activity. The hidden message
of schools and universities is that you can only get your training in a
class as an educational consumer. Where in our society do we teach people
to become continuous learners outside the classroom? We hope life-long
learning will happen, and for everyone to some extent it does. There is
that haphazard and random activity most people call the school of life,
where you take the test first and if you fail you try to learn the lesson.
Too many people get all their adult education that way. Continuous learning
from life experience cannot be effective without recording, measuring and
re-organising one's own data. Who has their own data? Sadly, not very many.
Experienced continuous learners find data at work, in community activities,
on television, in books and in nature. The environment is your laboratory,
but without the systematic collection of data it is not the source of growth
it might be. Who has the confidence to begin collecting their own data
at age 20 knowing that the value of this work may not be evident for ten
years or more? When is anyone told that such an activity might be useful,
let alone essential to future success?
The essential power-house of any community is what people do as volunteers.
It's in the ability of people to raise their hands and say I'll do that,
to make suggestions and then volunteer to lead the project. The willingness
of people to volunteer for activities that they are not paid for is critical.
Much of the best work of any community is unpaid work. Those who study,
those who lead or coach in sports clubs, those who work in cultural clubs,
those who care for children, those who undertake private research and those
who are active members of political parties. That doesn't count all the
voluntary work most of us do inside our families, the daily round of caring
for each other. When that work is done nobody counts it, but when it's
neglected look at the cost; the misery, the broken lives, the crime, the
addiction cost, the loss of educational opportunity, the social welfare
cost, and the loss of productivity.